TC which is the same as
Whistleblowers as in application fo1ms and Whistleblower Declarations:
Mobile contact email
Mobile contact in email
Dear Ms Norberg,
Given the fact meanwhile 6 years have passed without any result, we
assume that the SEC is intending to cover the money laundering fraud
scheme operated by HSBC via various companies and management
buyout activities described in detail by us. You have received more than
2000 original papers, account numbers and names. You have also got the
links to ML fraud schemes which have been operated after you fined HSBC
in 2012. The FinCEN Files leaked now in various European journals
demonstrate we have not exaggerated – but the FinCEN files do not cover
the involvement of our case, which has been backed by UK and US intel as
well as covered by the SEC itself.
As our US lawyer, , has already written you years
ago, without even getting a response, we do consider this case as worth
becoming a part of the public FinCEN files scandal.
We are talking about an unique criminal ML fraud scheme in which US, UK
and Romanian citizens are involved, as well as the German subsidiary of
HSBC (HSBC TRINKAUS) plays a major role as “white labeling” the
companies used in Luxembourg as “clean”. It may be coincidence or not
that on of the 3 candidates willing to replace Chancellor ANGELA MERKEL
in December as Party leader of the CDU, Mr Friedrich Merz, is member of
the supervisory board of HSBC Trinkaus. I wonder if Mr Merz has ever
been informed by any authority about the ongoing fraud scheme which he
is expected to combat by monitoring the activities of HSBC Trinkaus. I
also wonder if the silence of the SEC in this case may have political
reasons, in which, among others, German domestic politics can be
influenced by letting key players run into the open knife.
However, fact is that the SEC by doing nothing is explicit covering the
activities of HSBC, ignoring the BASEL II regulations of the European,
ignoring the KYC and AML regulations of the European Union, especially
the 5th AML directive of the EU Commission valid since May 2018. Even
worse than this, the SEC is helping white collar criminals at HSBC to stay
active, without any fear to be sanctioned or jailed.
With more than great surprise I therefore resume in a short list which
aspects your agency is actively covering and hiding, so the public never
had the chance to learn about:
• HSBC has used and is using a network via shell companies in
Romania, Luxembourg, Cyprus, Malta and the BVI which only
purpose was to wash 200 mio. EUR
• HSBC has made false account and bilances declarations about it’s
HEAREF funds, by this violating several SEC regulations and
giving false investment information towards any investor who
invested in the fund, violating the investments advisors act of the
• HSBC has also intentional did not made the required audits at the
buyout towards INFRARED CAPITAL PARTNERS
• HSBC has use phantom companies in the countries above to
overevaluate (pimp up) the real estate acquirements which have
been financed by credits of the ALPHA BANK in Cyprus toward
Baloo Limited – at least the Bank is know as being one of the ML
• The credits which HSBC got via the constructs very detailed
explained in our submissions since we started where FAKE
CREDITS, did not respect any financial authority requirements
and are severe violations of several SEC regulations
• HSBC has used a network of people in Romania (straw people)
which had direct contacts to terrorist organizations and
• HSBC has violated the above mentioned points AFTER it had been
fined by SEC and paying more than 2 bln. USD on fine for ML
purposes, thus violating the settlement agreement with the SEC.
• HSBC has used INFRARED CAPITAL PARTNERS as shadow
company to operate the ml fraud scheme, violating several Basel
II requirements due to the fake credits of ALPHA BANK and
• Moreover we would like to extend our focus on PwC which
as an audit company did not mention any of the fraud
activities of HSBC in the audit period in which HSBC did
the frauds. PwC London should have been obliged to find
out what happened in Bucharest via it’s Bucharest
dependence, but at least within the final audits within the
auditing period for HSBC. All details have been submitted
in the past by us.
We therefore conclude that none of the points above are considered by
your organization as being a fraud, nor being criminal, as otherwise you
would have sanctioned HSBC and the affiliated players and would have
payed us our reward.
We are pleased to announce you that we now will inform major press
organizations in the US, UK and Germany about our own experience with
the SEC and HSBC.
We no longer will accept the fact your organization is playing a selective
game with whistleblowers who risk all for helping the US to combat
terrorism and financial crime. If HSBC is to big for the SEC to be
sanctioned in this case, you should write this on your website – so no
single whistleblower will ever risk his live again because of misleading
information regarding the Whistleblower Program of the SEC.
In case you whish to come back to the normal whistleblower programe
trail before this month ends, please feel free to contact me .
Starting with October 2020 all correspondence with SEC, documents and
materials will be made available for the public.
This is a case to big to fail.
Original content from file sent to the SEC on September 21th 2020